Thank you very much Eugene.
The "Show all properties" was the one I overlooked, and the script part is brilliant :)
Almost ready for real testing. Just some issues left how I can handle Exchange mail and user creation.
When I log into the Help Desk part of Adaxes as a HR User, I don't get a Create new user option
What should I do to get this option under Actions?
These are currently our HR Permissions:
Regarding my mailbox/Exchange issues, here what I would like to happen:
1 - I log-on to Help-Desk and choose New user under Actions.
2 - I fill out all fields(predefine what fields should be filled out[visible]: i do this from "Adaxes Web Interface Configuration" under "AD Management", right!)
2.1 - Our users are setup like this: "Samuel"[%firstname%] - "L. Jackson"[%lastname%] - User logon name/sAMAccountName "slj"[%?????%].
Exchange: See the screenshot below.
As you can see. This is how I would like the mail addresses set up(and I would like to have the Check-mark "Automatically update e-mail addresses based on e-mail address policy" removed). There is a couple of issues here. In my User example above the last-name is "L. Jackson". You can see the . after the L here in the SMTP address, but what if the user was named "Samuel L. Cool Jackson". Then the mail address would be "Samuel.L.CoolJackson@domain.com". Now there is missing a . between Cool and Jackson. I don't want all spaces replaced by a . and if there already is a . then just remove the empty space. Point being that we always end up with a SMTP address that complies with our IT policy(which btw I did not create :) ).
I assume the sAMAccountname, when entered when creating the user is checked if it is in use already(as login-name and SMTP alias[mailNickname])?(if not, how can I achieve this?)
3 - Then there are the Exchange storage groups. We have 5 exchange storage groups. User mailbox should be placed depending on which Security group he is a member of when he is created(I know how to achieve this, the problem is... see picture below). There are multiple Security groups belonging to single exchange storage groups. If i could change the AND to a OR only in this line(instead it changes all AND to OR), it would solve the issue!
That's all I could think of right now. (Just kidding :) )
I know this can probably be difficult for you to explain everything to me here. If it is possible, we could have a TeamViewer session(please PM me, if this is possible). I bet that would save you some serious time instead of explaining everything to me in details.
I have to demo this to a couple of people, and it has to work correctly when i do this demo/live test. It will be the decisive factor if my boss wants to pay for a license or not(which i of course want him to, so we can be offloaded at bit regarding general user maintenance).